NEIGHBOR constructs a tree by successive clustering of lineages, setting branch lengths as the lineages join. The tree is not rearranged thereafter. The tree does not assume an evolutionary clock, so that it is in effect an unrooted tree. It should be somewhat similar to the tree obtained by FITCH. The program cannot evaluate a User tree, nor can it prevent branch lengths from becoming negative. However the algorithm is far faster than FITCH or KITSCH. This will make it particularly effective in their place for large studies or for bootstrap or jackknife resampling studies which require runs on multiple data sets.
The UPGMA option constructs a tree by successive (agglomerative) clustering using an average-linkage method of clustering. It has some relationship to KITSCH, in that when the tree topology turns out the same, the branch lengths with UPGMA will turn out to be the same as with the P = 0 option of KITSCH.
The options for NEIGHBOR are selected through the menu, which looks like this:
Neighbor-Joining/UPGMA method version 3.5 Settings for this run: N Neighbor-joining or UPGMA tree? Neighbor-joining O Outgroup root? No, use as outgroup species 1 L Lower-triangular data matrix? No R Upper-triangular data matrix? No S Subreplicates? No J Randomize input order of species? No. Use input order M Analyze multiple data sets? No 0 Terminal type (IBM PC, VT52, ANSI)? ANSI 1 Print out the data at start of run No 2 Print indications of progress of run Yes 3 Print out tree Yes 4 Write out trees onto tree file? Yes Are these settings correct? (type Y or the letter for one to change)Most of the input options (L, R, S, J, and M) are as given in the Distance Matrix Programs documentation file, that file, and their input format is the same as given there. The O (Outgroup) option is described in the main documentation file of this package. It is not available when the UPGMA option is selected. The Jumble option (J) does not allow multiple jumbles (as most of the other programs that have it do), as there is no objective way of choosing which of the multiple results is best, there being no explicit criterion for optimality of the tree.
Option N chooses between the Neighbor-Joining and UPGMA methods. Option S is the usual Subreplication option. Here, however, it is present only to allow NEIGHBOR to read the input data: the number of replicates is actually ignored, even though it is read in. Note that this means that one cannot use it to have missing data in the input file, if NEIGHBOR is to be used.
The output consists of an tree (rooted if UPGMA, unrooted if Neighbor- Joining) and the lengths of the interior segments. The Average Percent Standard Deviation is not computed or printed out. If the tree found by Neighbor is fed into FITCH as a User Tree, it will compute this quantity if one also selects the N option of FITCH to ensure that none of the branch lengths is re-estimated.
As NEIGHBOR runs it prints out an account of the successive clustering levels, if you allow it to. This is mostly for reassurance and can be suppressed using menu option 2. In this printout of cluster levels the word "OTU" refers to a tip species, and the word "NODE" to an interior node of the resulting tree.
The constants available for modification at the beginning of the program are "namelength" which gives the length of a species name, and the usual boolean constants that initiliaze the terminal type. There is no feature saving multiply trees tied for best, partly because we do not expect exact ties except in cases where the branch lengths make the nature of the tie obvious, as when a branch is of zero length.
The major advantage of NEIGHBOR is its speed: it requires a time only proportional to the square of the number of species. By contrast FITCH and KITSCH require a time that rises as the fourth power of the number of species. Thus NEIGHBOR is well-suited to bootstrapping studies and to analysis of very large trees. Our simulation studies (Kuhner, Yamato and Felsenstein, in preparation) show that, contrary to statements in the literature by others, NEIGHBOR does not get as accurate an estimate of the phylogeny as does FITCH. However it does nearly as well, and in view of its speed this will make it a quite useful program.
TEST DATA SET
Alpha 0.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 3.000
Beta 1.000 0.000 2.000 3.000 3.000
Gamma 2.000 2.000 0.000 3.000 3.000
Delta 3.000 3.000 3.000 0.000 1.000
Epsilon 3.000 3.000 3.000 1.000 0.000
OUTPUT FROM TEST DATA SET (with all numerical options on)
Neighbor-Joining/UPGMA method version 3.5
Negative branch lengths allowed
Alpha 0.00000 1.00000 2.00000 3.00000 3.00000
Beta 1.00000 0.00000 2.00000 3.00000 3.00000
Gamma 2.00000 2.00000 0.00000 3.00000 3.00000
Delta 3.00000 3.00000 3.00000 0.00000 1.00000
Epsilon 3.00000 3.00000 3.00000 1.00000 0.00000
remember: this is an unrooted tree!
Between And Length
------- --- ------
3 Gamma 1.00000
3 1 1.50000
1 Delta 0.50000
1 Epsilon 0.50000
3 2 0.50000
2 Alpha 0.50000
2 Beta 0.50000
Back to the main PHYLIP page
Back to the SEQNET home page